There is no ‘5G-screen’
Richard Jones wrote, in a previous letter to the editor, that the sun’s radiation is at “levels far above anything a cell tower or utility meter emits.”
In reply, I ask if Mr. Jones would like to be exposed to the sun’s radiation 24/7, with no sunscreen available - no shade - no opt out possible?
This is the current situation with all wireless radiation. These exposures will become more extreme with the installation of hundreds of new 4G and then 5G antennas in the near future.
There is much more science I could share, which is available on these two websites — ehtrust.org and saferemr.com.
I understand that this invisible radiation seems harmless. I used to think this way too, until I developed sudden, severe symptoms from my own exposure to just the current levels of technology.
— Satya Orion, Felton
We are the actual science experiment
In response to Richard Jones’ comment that “subjecting test subjects to massive overdoses of an item of concern is not good science,” my answer is that the amount of wireless radiation that the population is currently exposed to is the actual science experiment.
Scientist Allan Frey said, “What we’re doing is a grand world experiment without informed consent.” In 1975, Frey published a paper in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences which reported that exposure to low intensity microwave radiation could open the blood-brain barrier in rats. Moreover, pulsed radio frequency waves (like Bluetooth) were more likely to produce this effect than continuous waves.
A 2010 article in GQ gives more information: https://www.gq.com/story/warning-cell-phone-radiation
Also the following 2018 article published in The Nation: https://www.thenation.com/article/how-big-wireless-made-us-think-that-cell-phones-are-safe-a-special-investigation/
I ask that everyone do your own research on this. We are all being affected without our consent!
— Satya Orion, Felton
Richard Jones wrote, in a previous letter to the editor, that the sun’s radiation is at “levels far above anything a cell tower or utility meter emits.”
In reply, I ask if Mr. Jones would like to be exposed to the sun’s radiation 24/7, with no sunscreen available - no shade - no opt out possible?
This is the current situation with all wireless radiation. These exposures will become more extreme with the installation of hundreds of new 4G and then 5G antennas in the near future.
There is much more science I could share, which is available on these two websites — ehtrust.org and saferemr.com.
I understand that this invisible radiation seems harmless. I used to think this way too, until I developed sudden, severe symptoms from my own exposure to just the current levels of technology.
— Satya Orion, Felton
We are the actual science experiment
In response to Richard Jones’ comment that “subjecting test subjects to massive overdoses of an item of concern is not good science,” my answer is that the amount of wireless radiation that the population is currently exposed to is the actual science experiment.
Scientist Allan Frey said, “What we’re doing is a grand world experiment without informed consent.” In 1975, Frey published a paper in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences which reported that exposure to low intensity microwave radiation could open the blood-brain barrier in rats. Moreover, pulsed radio frequency waves (like Bluetooth) were more likely to produce this effect than continuous waves.
A 2010 article in GQ gives more information: https://www.gq.com/story/warning-cell-phone-radiation
Also the following 2018 article published in The Nation: https://www.thenation.com/article/how-big-wireless-made-us-think-that-cell-phones-are-safe-a-special-investigation/
I ask that everyone do your own research on this. We are all being affected without our consent!
— Satya Orion, Felton
RSS Feed