EMF Aware - Santa Cruz
Contact Us
  • Home
  • Sources of EMF
  • EMF Health Symptoms
  • Lowering EMF Exposure
  • Scientific Research
  • EMF Scientist Appeal
  • Blog/Newsletter
  • Event Videos
  • Videos
  • EMF & Children's Health
  • The Bioiniative Report
  • EMF Safety Standards
  • FCC - Captured Agency
  • Firefighters Exemption
  • Lawsuits Pending
  • EMF Home Safety
  • EMF Home Inspections
  • EMF Testing Meters
  • Dirty Electricity
  • What is 5G
  • 5G Space Appeal
  • Electromagnetic Sensitivity
  • ADA
  • Recommended Websites
  • Books & DVD's
  • City of Santa Cruz
  • Small Cell Ordinance
  • New Applications
  • Santa Cruz County
  • Contact Us

JML LAW WINS APPEAL IN ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ ELECTROMAGNETIC HYPERSENSITIVITY DISABILITY CASE

5/12/2021

 
Picture
Friday, March 26, 2021 12:15 PM
Online link to this press release


Brown v. LAUSD establishes that symptoms of ‘electromagnetic hypersensitivity’ a.k.a. ‘Microwave Sickness’ could be deemed a ‘physical disability’ under the FEHA

Today, JML Law announced it has won a major appeal in the California Court of Appeal that establishes that a plaintiff who pleads symptoms and physical manifestations of “electromagnetic hypersensitivity” has adequately alleged that they suffer from a “physical disability” under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”).

In the majority opinion handed down in the case, Brown v. LAUSD (Appeal No. B294240), the Court of Appeal recognized that it doesn’t matter whether or not other courts in the United States have recognized “electromagnetic hypersensitivity” as a disability under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) because JML Law’s client, Laurie Brown, has brought her case not under the ADA, but under FEHA, which is broader in scope.

​The Court of Appeal held that Brown sufficiently alleged that she suffered from a physical disability under the FEHA and that she sufficiently stated a cause of action for failure to accommodate, where she alleged that LAUSD refused to honor an accommodation which LAUSD had agreed to provide to Brown. The Court of Appeal stated that based on their reading of Brown’s First Amended Complaint, “LAUSD’s actions here do not align with those of an employer taking positive steps to accommodate the employee’s limitations.”


The complete published opinion by the Court of Appeal: 
https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B294240.PDF.



https://ehtrust.org/lawfirm-jml-law-wins-appeal-in-unprecedented-disability-case-against-lausd-for-failure-to-accommodate-teacher-with-electromagnetic-hypersensitivity/


Comments are closed.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    October 2020
    August 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019

    Categories

    All
    5G
    5G Crisis Summit
    5G Satellites
    5G Space Appeal
    Actions
    Allan Frey
    Arthur Firstenberg
    Cell Phone Safety
    Children
    China
    Coronovirus
    Dafna Tachover
    Driverless Cars
    Eye Damage
    Fiber Optics
    Firefighters
    Good News
    Gratitude And Awareness
    Health
    Henry Lai
    Julian Gresser
    Lawsuits
    Letters
    Media Coverage
    Newsletter
    Olle Johansson
    Safety
    Sam Milham
    Smart Grids
    Trees

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly